![]() The easiest way to avoid this problem is to purchase equipment listed in the Windows Server Catalog. This is more concerning worry than over-engineering, as non-virtualized systems almost always have a higher overall cost to purchase and operate.Īnother issue with storage is that, even with Hyper-V’s versatility, not all kinds will function well with Hyper-V. The danger with an underpowered solution is that it can cause an institutional revolt against virtualization in general, which in turn can cause management to demand an architectural reversion to non-virtualized systems. While rarer, some do not provide adequate performance. ![]() In the most common cases, these designs will cost far more than a more realistic solution. As a result, many institutions will purchase a cookie-cutter design from a vendor’s list of arbitrarily tiered and titled packages. It can be difficult to predict in advance what a virtualization platform will need. One very real danger in storage design is over-engineering. The focus of this article will be architecting a solid storage configuration for your Hyper-V infrastructure with best practices to help get you started. Configuring and connecting storage is usually not the biggest challenge that administrators face. This affords it a great deal of flexibility at the expense of presenting a maze of choices. As with most other technologies, Hyper-V can use many different types of storage and methods of storage connectivity and configuration. Hyper-V Storage is one of the most variegated subjects in all of computing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |